When is John Kerry going to explain why he voted for the invasion of Iraq, but against the funding that secures the future of that new democracy? It was obviously nothing more than a political decision intended to appeal to the anti-war crowd. Is that supposed to give us confidence in his leadership? All it really does is make him into a flip-flopping sack of it.
And what about the numerous weapons systems and intelligence programs Kerry has routinely voted to cut for the past 20 years? Without those arrows in our quiver, we'd have no shot at defending ourselves and bringing al-Qaeda to justice. Does this guy have any sense of what our military needs now that Viet Nam is 30 years behind us? No.
Face it: Kerry is weak on defense and on intelligence. If our country had followed his lead in the past, we would be a far less secure place. There's really no question about that.
We can't afford to let him be elected.
Remember: a vote for Kerry is a vote for those who hate America. Already, Kim Jong-Il has indicated that he will drag out any talks about his nuclear weapons programs until he gets a better partner to "deal with" come next January. Iran, too, is bridling a little bit at the IAEA's and the UN's interest in their nuclear capabilities. The mullahs know that if they can keep the "international community" at arm's length, it will delay Uncle Sam's inevitable entry into their situation since we're going to have to fight those stupid fucks, too, just to get across the street. If we put Kerry in office, Korean totalitarianism and Islamofascism will perceive it as a victory. Don't let that happen.