Mood:
incredulousAll the big shots in the Democratic Party were at some sort of love-in last night where they declared John Kerry the leader of their party and just a great guy in general.
But the best soundbite I caught (and I'm hoping to bring you a full transcript later) was Bill Clinton's explanation for Kerry's vote against the funding package to help out our military and the new Iraqi government. Clinton said that the package was going to win, anyway, so Kerry voted as he did in protest of the President's war of liberation. Was there another reason why Kerry lodged his protest (besides the need to appeal to the left wing of his party)? Why, yes! Kerry voted no because Bush did not bring the UN into help decide how things were going to be.
That's good stuff there. That would be the same UN which is full of crooked assholes whose sole reason for opposing us in our just cause was to preserve their kickback arrangements with Saddam Hussein.
Disgusting. Is there any doubt that a vote for Kerry is a vote for those who hate America? Is it really appropriate for Jimmy Carter to publicly discourage Ralph Nader from running and accuse him of costing the Gorebot the White House in 2000? Just because Carter humiliated this nation with his ineptitude while he was the President doesn't mean he has the privilege of trying to freeze out a legitimate candidate for the Presidency. And is it really right that a draft-dodger and kook like Howard Dean has any business of once again insinuating that Kerry's war record somehow makes Bush a coward? Where was Dean during the Viet Nam War? Enjoying a medical deferment for a bad back while hitting the slopes. He's almost as big a turd blossom as Richard Clarke, who ought to be indicted, tried, and convicted of perjury.
Shame on all of the Dhimmicrats.