Sunday, 15 August 2004 - 9:25 PM CDT

ummm. I don't think it's relevant. You know, Hussein as terrorist is more of a jab against Bush I and his fumbling of the situation. Add to that the precious moments photo of Rumsfeld shaking Hussein's hand after he gassed a bunch of fellow dune coons. No, I think the fact remains that El presidente and his crew told Kerry and everyone else that Iraq had WMD and that they had a nuclear program so they could get into the Iraq war.
My concern is that Kerry is an opportunistic infection with mediocre ideas and questionable effectiveness. This, however is much better than the billowing cancer of the same stamp that occupies the whitehouse today. Bush and company must be purged. If voting for a stiff, humorless piece of wood is what I need to do in order to get this pack of hyenas out of government, then so be it.
Fukk you in your man-pussy for trying to rub it in.

Monday, 16 August 2004 - 4:47 AM CDT

Not relevant?! What planet are you on?

I agree that Bush the Elder should've overthrown Saddam when we were there the first time, but that wasn't part of the "international" mandate, was it?

I see that you're still in denial about the pre-war intelligence on Saddam's WMD. Name me one intelligence service anywhere on Earth that didn't believe that Iraq had such weapons. Is there any reason for your willful ignorance of this universal certainty (besides the fact that the anti-American Michael Moore is balls-deep into your backside)? Despite what liars like Joe Wilson say, the Saddamites did seek yellowcake from Niger. What reason would the have had for this if Saddam wasn't trying to explore his nuclear capabilities?

If you actually watched that video, you have to know that Kerry is a flip-flopping opportunist and a hypocrite on the whole issue of whether Saddam was a potential threat. There is no other conclusion to draw.