Courtesy of Little Green Footballs, be sure to read this article discussing why Reuters "isn't comfortable with" using the term terrorist to describe terrorists.
"Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline."As I often say, it is a hallmark of the degenerate liberal mind to hold that a name is the determinant of the thing it purports to describe. Labels are sacrosanct. If these "internationalist" reporters ---who know more than us American hayseeds--- don't call murderers murderers, then they are not that, but militants or rebels or gunmen.
Orwell lives.
The day will come when terrorists and all their abetting cocksuckers can dispense with names and belong only to amounts ---great piles of smoldering shit on the edges of free nations.