Listen to Donald Rumsfeld's recent observations on how the press presents the story in Iraq:
"There are two ways, I suppose, one could inform readers of the Geneva Convention stipulation against using places of worship to conduct military attacks. One might be to headline saying that Terrorists Attack Coalition Forces From Mosques. That would be one way to present the information.
"Another might be to say: Mosques Targeted in Fallujah. That was the Los Angeles Times headline this morning."
Don't let these commies in the media and the blogosphere tell you that what they're doing by slanting their coverage in favor of terrorist assholes is somehow "patriotic." They don't know what words mean anymore, nor are they capable of appreciating the irony of speaking under the protection of the First Amendment in defense of people who would wipe their asses with our Constitution if they even knew what one looked like.
Does the anti-war Left (which includes shit like my most favorite group of late, "Lesbians for a Free Palestine") even stop to consider what sort of enormously violent and oppressive assholes they're defending against our "imperialist aggressions"? Is Leftism nothing more than impotent contrarianism, devoid of principle and common sense? Because I think that, if they actually thought about what good is coming of our military's sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan, they'd shut up for five seconds and be grateful that human liberties await the Mohammedan world. But the detractions and seditiousness of these Leftist tools keeps us from the resolve and unity we could really use right now to get the job done.