Insinuate. It's Good for You.
Oh, I like this very much:

Asked specifically whether team Kerry and the Democratic Party were involved in the forged document scandal, White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters: "It's clear that this is an orchestrated effort by Democrats and the Kerry campaign. And that's what I'm talking about when I talk about these latest attacks."

Asked directly whether the forged documents came from Democrats or the Kerry campaign, McClellan stated flatly "I believe that the Democrats and the Kerry campaign are behind these old, recycled attacks on the president's service, absolutely."

As evidence of Democratic Party involvement, McClellan cited a new ad sponsored by the Democratic National Committee, which featured clips from Rather's forged document report, along with visuals of what appear to be copies of the forgeries themselves.

Yes. Let's have some more of this. The White House has played it beautifully. Let Courageous Dan and the other clowns step on their dicks for a whole week without saying anything. And, then, come out and make the connection between the Killian Forgeries and the Democratic Attack Machine and the Kerry campaign. Even if it's not true, it will force these rectal thermometers to defend themselves against it.

And what does that get you? Another week of Viet Fucking Nam, baby. Another week where it just makes sense to discuss why Lt. John Kerry was chatting up Madame Binh in Paris during the Peace Talks while American soldiers were fighting back in Viet Nam. That is to ask, who authorized a lieutenant in the United States Navy to go and meet with the enemy in Paris during a time of war? Was he an agent of the State Department? Never heard it if he was. In what capacity was he there? I'd really like to know. Forget his fucking medals and ribbons: I want to know why John Kerry was sucking up to the VC in a chateau over wine and brie.

Got an answer, you waffling windbag?

UPDATE: Hmmm. Apparently, the NewsMax.com story I quoted from was, shall we say, influenced by none other than the New York Times. In a story by Jim Rutenberg and Kate Zernike, they write:

Scott McClellan, the White House spokesman, said at a news briefing that the Democratic National Committee and the Kerry campaign were behind the documents, an accusation both camps denied.

But, if you read this post at the BeldarBlog, it's not entirely clear that McClellan ever said such a thing.

I don't know. As I read it all again, I think McClellan may very well have been suggesting that the DNC and the Kerrion had a hand in those forgeries. It's all good, though. Let 'em twist.