Screen Shot
This is the sort of thing that Duncan Black allows on his blog Eschaton. The whole place is infested with pseudonymous cowards who physically threaten people they disagree with.
It may be that Black is embarrassed to have become the host to such a pack of intellectually and morally stunted craphounds ---and doesn't want me around to expose the inadequacies of his site.
Got It
I finally figured out what causes Duncan Black to ban me. It's his deep fear that the only [scandal] he's got going right now with the Bush White House is going nowhere. And he doesn't want any interloper on his threads pointing out what a bunch of fucking liars Wilson and Plame are.
Oh, well. He's probably doing me a favor by preventing me from wasting so much of my online time at his coffee klatch.
Why Are Leftists Such Idiots?
Why are Leftists such idiots? Because they believe that whatever the dominant actor or system that's at work in their world is, it is, by its very dominance, evil. Of course, they would never stoop to the level of using such a loaded, theological term as evil, but that's what they mean. Which brings up the fact that a Leftist's inclination to pass judgement is hypocritical since it is only acted upon in response to that dominant power and without regard to its actual moral value. That is the only time when it is correct to judge. At all other events, passing judgement is what a dominator does ---and, being an adherent to the ideology of losers and submissives--- the Leftist cannot debase himself so.
Thus, what must be such a person's moral baseline? How can he claim to exercise free will when his only moral standard is the reflexive negation of things that succeed? That is to ask, how can the impulse to destroy and subvert everything around him be an affirmative and autonomous trait? The Leftist's failure to be constructive and rise above the mean is nothing but moral entropy. But that's how he likes his society: diffuse, "above" judgement, and glorifiably impotent.
This is what is at work in the multicultural age. This is why a person who is fortunate enough to live in the modern and materially satisfied West ---with all the rights and privileges that may be enjoyed in a democratic republic--- cannot bring himself to pass judgement on the very force that would bring all of it down. You cannot, finally, fail to condemn what Islam intends for the world if you yourself believe that women and homosexuals and people of faith should be able to exercise their human rights without the fear of oppression and death. You must act against that ideology if you wish to save the one that enables you to believe as you do.
It is might against might that will settle the question of which actors and systems are to survive. But it is false and self-negating and inhuman to suppose that might and right are mutually exclusive ---and to base the whole of your ideology, you Leftist idiots, on the notion that what is dominant is inherently oppressive to human potential. If you cannot bring yourself to pass judgement on the force that would have your heads as soon as it would have mine, it will be left to others to decide the fate of the world without regard to your sensibilities and fashionable ---but fake--- equanimity.
Margin Calling
Courtesy of Pejmanesque, here's Dan Balz's piece in the Washington Post yesterday on how the Left are taking to Hillary Rodham Clinton's migration rightward:
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's call for an ideological cease-fire in the Democratic Party drew an angry reaction yesterday from liberal bloggers and others on the left, who accused her of siding with the centrist Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) in a long-running dispute over the future of the party.
Long a revered figure by many in the party's liberal wing, Clinton (D-N.Y.) unexpectedly found herself under attack after calling Monday for a cease-fire among the party's quarreling factions and for agreeing to assume the leadership of a DLC-sponsored initiative aimed at developing a more positive policy agenda for the party.
The reaction highlighted the dilemma Democratic politicians face trying to satisfy energized activists on the left -- many of whom are hungering for party leaders to advance a more full-throated agenda and more aggressively confront President Bush -- while also cultivating the moderate Democrats and independents whose support is crucial to winning elections. The challenge has become more acute because of the power and importance grass-roots activists, symbolized by groups such as MoveOn.org and liberal bloggers, have assumed since the 2004 election.
The most pointed critique of Clinton came in one of the most influential blogs on the left, Daily Kos out of Berkeley, Calif., which called Clinton's speech "truly disappointing" and said she should not provide cover for an organization that often has instigated conflict within the party.
So I guess the days of the New Democrats are over. Even though the Left have no choice but to remember ---long and loud--- the halcyon days of yore when Bill was lying and people weren't dying and the great economy (that was built on the crown of an untenable bubble) and the general retreat from the reality of a sociopathic religion beating on our front doors.
Archaiophobia Mood: don't ask
One of my oldest phobias is the tarantula. And when I got home yesterday, there was a dying one in my kitchen. I put a small wastepaper basket over it because I can't even bring myself to pick it up yet. Jesus! Yeccchhhh!!!
Me and Lance Armstrong Mood: celebratory
I don't mean to sound like the unathletic, sometimes anti-bicycling old man that I am, but I am completely indifferent to the very wonderful news that Lance Armstrong has won his seventh consecutive Tour de France.
I suppose I would have been vaguely disappointed at his frustration had he failed to capture the title again, but as it is, I am simply hoping that the hoopla simmers down sometime soon.
Having said that, I am proud of this man in the way that a total stranger whose life does not resemble or touch upon his can be. Armstrong is a marvel of human endurance and will and anybody should be in awe of his physical skills.
But I am most proud of his story as a survivor of cancer. After the loss of my own father to cancer, I did a very rare thing: I wrote to this young man ---only two years my junior--- and wished him well. And not long after, someone with his foundation wrote me back in thanks. I've always thought that was classy and, regardless of my own chairbound laziness and apathy, I will always regard Lance Armstrong as an inspiration.
Tour de France, yeah, yeah, blah, blah... What else do you expect of the heroic?
Close to the Bone
Captain Ed's got a great story about a proposal in New Hampshire to seize the land and farmhouse of Supreme Court Justice David Souter and sell it for development:
Not long ago, after Supreme Court Justice David Souter supported the seizure of private property in the Kelo decision, a collection of activists decided to take Souter at his word and exercise eminent domain on his house in Weare, New Hampshire in order to build a hotel. Freestar Media wanted to bring the foolishness of Kelo to Souter's doorstep -- literally. And despite Souter's popularity among his fellow New Hampshire citizens, they have surprisingly looked at Freestar's efforts with understanding, if not outright support[...]
I don't know what sort of precedent there is for this sort of blowback on a Supreme Court Justice, but it's strangely exhilarating.
You know: like the feeling certain developers are now getting as they drive through older, somewhat shabby neighborhoods in the middle of big cities.
"No stronger retrograde force exists in the world." Mood: on fire Now Playing: "Silver, Blue, and Gold" by Bad Company
I came across the following passage some time ago, but never got around to including it here. Now, with a hat tip to the boys at The Power Line and to this post at No Left Turns, read what the Most Important Person of the Twentieth Century said in 1899:
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities - but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.
Remember to Laugh in the Face of Leftist Hypocrites Who Profess [Outrage] at Plame's Outing
Don't forget to guffaw or ---failing that--- snort in the face of the next un-American Leftist you hear who claims that Karl Rove has compromised our national security by discussing Valerie Plame with a reporter. Such a person comes from a long line of violent and virulent opponents of the Central Intelligence Agency and any other apparatus of our intelligence community. And such a person is a hypocrite whose only concern at this concocted scandal is not the safety of our intelligence agents, but the removal of Rove from this Administration. That is to say, these Leftist subversives have assumed what they take to be the unassailable position of defending the intelligence community against the treachery of Bu$hitler's Imperial War Machine, Inc. But that is a pose to deceive the American People into thinking that these people actually care about their own country.
Just look at who the anti-war Left nominated for President in 2004: a man who routinely voted to cut appropriations for the CIA throughout most of his Senatorial career; a man who once declared that the CIA should be dissolved; a man who never hesitated to criticize the CIA's involvement in Central America and Southeast Asia. But John Kerry is also a man who brought Joe Wilson ---a notorious liar--- into his campaign as a foreign policy adviser, as well as that great stealer and destroyer of classified documents, Sandy Berger.
I don't think there's any question that the CIA and other intelligence agencies are political organizations at some level ---and are susceptible to control from above. But they are also staffed by humans with their own particular weaknesses and even agendas. These are not some sort of vestal virgins whose identities are, per se, sacrosanct; they can compromise themselves.
Which is what Valerie Plame did. She advocated her husband's involvement in investigating a claim that she herself said was "crazy." What better way to confirm your own prejuduces than to see to it that your husband be the one to go and ask some questions? And when he gets back home, what's the plan? To undermine the very evidence of Iraq's attempts to purchase yellowcake by lying to the American People. Don't forget: all that President Bush ever claimed in his 2003 State of the Union address was that Iraq had made the attempt. And Wilson knew that. And both the report of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and that of Lord Butler in Great Britain confirmed that attempt beyond any reasonable doubt.
So what a strange lie Joe Wilson told and in which his wife connived. He didn't feel bound to secrecy over his trip to Niger ---and no one in the Administration or the CIA ever held him to that responsibility. Instead, he goes and talks to reporters and pundits when he sees an opportunity to take advantage. He reports, behind the mask of anonymity, the details of his time in Niger to David Corn of The Nation and Nicholas Kristoff of the New York Times. Doing so, Wilson had raised the stakes ---based on these stories that he himself was moving.
And then there's the infamous New York Times op-ed piece Wilson wrote in which the lies come thick and fast. But what are facts when there's an Administration to oppose and a war to undermine? Dick Cheney didn't know anything about your stupid mission, Joe. He didn't have anything to do with it. But your wife did ---so why lie about that? Iraq did attempt to procure uranium in Niger as well as in other African countries. Didn't you know that? I think you must have. And your wife should have, being an expert of some kind on weapons of mass destruction.
But, in the end, I think it's clear that Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame threw themselves a coming out party. They decided to make themselves celebrities to a cause ---and to use their resumes as immunity against any claim that they were acting on partisan motivations. But that sort of hypocrisy doesn't wash with me ---nor will it when the American People come to understand what sort of game they've been running on us.
WASHINGTON, (AP) -- Democratic Sen. John Kerry urged the White House on Friday to release "in their entirety" all documents and memos from Supreme Court nominee John Roberts' tenure in two Republican administrations.
"We cannot do our duty if either Judge Roberts or the Bush administration hides elements of his professional record," said the Massachusetts senator who was his party's presidential candidate last year.
Is this guy serious? This is the guy that allowed his candidacy for the Presidency to be wrecked because he didn't want people to see his own records ---including the awful truth that George W. Bush was a better student than he was.
Sleight of Mind
I read several full news reports tonight on the topic of this much-discussed classified 2003 State Department memo ---and not one of them makes any connection to Karl Rove except tangentially and by the merest sort of implication. The chickenshittedness of this is almost appalling, but it just goes on and on.
Look at this CNN report, featuring the photo you see here of the President and Rove from the other day. Start reading it and you won't even come to a mention of Rove's name until the nineteenth paragraph:
Time magazine correspondent Matthew Cooper said Sunday that Bush's chief political adviser, Karl Rove, told him Wilson's wife worked for the CIA and that Lewis Libby, chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney, confirmed that piece of information.
What does this have to do with the State Department memo?
The implication is that Karl Rove must have seen that memo. Really? Why do the craphounds in Big Media think that? Because this is a memo that was not only marked with a big "S" ---for SECRET--- but includes the name of Valerie Wilson.
Are you homing in on the logic yet? Don't be fooled by the non sequiturs here. Just keep focused.
[...] it turns out a key portion of a two-year-old State Department memo that is now at the center of the controversy was classified — and that could mean leaking it was a crime.
At the time the State Department wrote its memo, the administration's key rationale for war in Iraq was crumbling. No weapons of mass destruction had been found and some key intelligence used to make the administration's case had proven false. An internal war raged inside the administration over who was to blame.
No, no: this is a news report, see. There's no editorializing here at all. And how did this memo make it all the way to "the center of the controversy"? Because CBS News and the other subsidiaries of al-Jazeera say so. Beeyotch. But don't miss the non sequitur that comes in at the second-to-last paragraph:
Karl Rove has admitted to discussing Wilson's wife with at least one reporter. But Rove's attorney says that the first time Rove saw — or even heard about the state department memo — was when investigators showed it to him.
But what does Karl Rove have to do with anything else in the story? So far, the only person we know for sure that this classified State Department memo was delivered to was the fucking Secretary of State himself ---the great, untouchable Colin Powell. I mean, why would Rove be walking around with a secret State Department memo? That was what Powell was doing! Go look it up in the Los Angeles Times:
The memo was sent by State Department officials to then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, who according to news reports has testified before the grand jury. Powell had the memo with him on Air Force One when President Bush traveled to Africa on July 7, 2003, the day after Wilson's piece was published, according to a person with knowledge of the investigation.
What happened on Air Force One has been of interest to prosecutors, who want to know whether anyone who saw the memo learned Plame's identity and told it to journalists.
Hmmm. I dunno. Maybe it was Colin Fucking Powell who leaked Plame's name. Is anybody thinking of that possibility? Maybe. They're thinking of lots of things (my emphasis added):
A State Department analyst who had attended the meeting at which the CIA decided to dispatch Wilson to Africa to check out the story kept the notes from that session, the former official said. The notes mentioned that Wilson's wife had suggested sending Wilson.
After getting [Deputy Secretary of State Richard] Armitage's request, the State Department's then-intelligence chief, Carl Ford, ordered the original memo — along with the analyst's notes about that meeting — to be sent to Powell, the former official said. Ordinarily, the memo would have been transmitted directly to Powell over the State Department's secure communications lines. But because Powell was traveling with Bush, the memo was transmitted via the White House operations center.
See? You knew that this had to somehow be tied back to the White House and, of course, the Architect. Powell may not be responsible for any leaks because the White House handled the memos at some point. The custodians of the chain are stirring now!
Because both documents were classified, it would have been necessary for someone on the plane to sign for having received them from the White House operations center, the former official said. But once someone signed for them, the document could have been passed around freely on the plane among senior officials who had security clearances.
Yeah, that's true. So wouldn't it be neat to know whether Karl Rove was on Air Force One that day and actually saw the memo? Let's find out.
Profanity Now Playing: "I'm Looking through You" by the Beatles
I strongly disapprove of this new Subaru ad using the Kansas masterpiece "Dust in the Wind". It seriously fucking annoys me. To my mind, it's like Viagra putting out an ad with the old church hymn "Rock of Ages" playing in the background ---or "Amazing Grace" accompanying a Metamucil ad.
It's inappropriate, you lousy heathens. I wish you would knock it off.
Dr. Rice, Kicker of Asses Mood: incredulous
Check out the story of what happened today in Khartoum when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's entourage was bullied and pushed around by the Sudanese security forces. Professor Reynolds points us to an AP report at Austin Bay's blog for details:
Security forces in the Sudanese capital manhandled U.S. officials and reporters traveling with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, marring her round of congratulatory meetings with leaders of the new unified government. Rice demanded an apology, and got it.
“It makes me very angry to be sitting there with their president and have this happen,” she said. “They have no right to push and shove.”
Rice made her remarks to reporters after she and her entourage boarded an airplane to fly from the capital to a refugee camp in the Darfur region. At the camp, she said the United States would hold the Sudanese government to account if it fails to end the refugee crisis.
State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said the Sudanese foreign minister responded to Rice’s demand for an apology by telephoning her aboard the plane to express regret for the incidents at the ultra-high-security residence of Sudanese President Omar el-Bashir.
Twice, Sudanese guards’ hostility toward members of Rice’s entourage devolved into shouts and shoving.
As Rice’s motorcade arrived at the residence, armed guards slammed the gate shut before three vehicles could get in, including those carrying Rice’s interpreter and other State Department officials who were supposed to attend her meeting with el-Bashir.
After protests, the officials were eventually allowed in. But guards repeatedly pushed and pulled Rice senior adviser Jim Wilkinson, and at one point he was shoved into a wall.
“Diplomacy 101 says you don’t rough your guests up,” Wilkinson said later.
What the hell? They say that NBC reporter Andrea Mitchell got muscled out of the room, too.
This ought to open some eyes in Big Media as to the fitness of towelheads to conduct themselves properly.
Cooling Her Heels Now Playing: "Vacation" by the Go-Gos
Via Duncan Black, here's a piece by Russ Baker on New York Times reporter Judith Miller.
The NYT editorial [see here -- TP] notes that while Time Magazine reporter Matthew Cooper was able to provide testimony and avoid jail because of a "specific waiver" of confidentiality from Rove, Miller "says she has not received any such thing from her sources." It also says that "coerced waivers of confidentiality are meaningless."
But we don't actually know that the waivers were coerced, and we don't know why, if Rove gave Cooper a "specific [noncoerced] waiver," Miller could not obtain one as well.
How are we to believe Miller, given her past track record, in misrepresenting her sources and their agendas, at great cost to this country? When the people of the United States were reading Miller's articles during the months leading up to the war with Iraq, reasonable people could have concluded that Miller had real, unbiased, credible and diverse sources. Eventually, we learned from an internal memo from Miller herself, that most of her reporting of WMD evidence came from an Iraqi exile with low general credibility who was hoping to lead a post-Saddam regime.
So, basically, Judy Miller is with the CIA. Or Halliburton. I'm not sure which. But she's a pariah of some kind among the Left.
If she's on the Martyr Diet, I don't know who she thinks is going to be paying her any compliments when she gets out.
Open the Hatch! Mood: loud
Ha, ha. Courtesy of Professor Reynolds, get a load of this post over at Trey Jackson's site. I had forgotten what Orrin Hatch said of Chuck Schumer's questioning of Judge Roberts during the future Justice's 2003 confirmation hearings for the D.C. Circuit Court. They even got audio there:
In the beginning of Wednesday's Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing for Bush nominee John G. Roberts Jr. Chairman Orrin Hatch praised Democrat Sen. Charles Schumer of New York for asking "intelligent" questions, but then Hatch switched gears.
"Some [of his questions] I totally disagree with," Hatch of Utah said. "Some I think are dumbass questions, between you and me. I am not kidding you. I mean, as much as I love and respect you, I just think that's true."
A stunned Schumer asked if he heard the chairman correctly, to which Hatch said yes. Again, Schumer asked Hatch if he would like to "revise and extend his remark," congressional speak for change his mind.
A former trial attorney, Hatch replied: "No, I am going to keep it exactly the way it is. I mean, I hate to say it. I mean, I feel badly saying it between you and me. But I do know dumbass questions when I see dumbass questions."
How many punk rock points does Hatch get for that?
(And how many times will that clip be played in the next several weeks? Not nearly enough.)
Defending the Patriot Act Mood: a-ok
President Bush gave a speech today in Baltimore in which he defended the Patriot Act and warned the Congress to not let its provisions expire (my emphasis added):
I want you to hear what Senator Dianne Feinstein, of California, said the other day. She said, "We have scrubbed the area and have no reported abuses." She was speaking about the Patriot Act. I want you to remember that the next time you hear someone make an unfair criticism of this important, good law. The Patriot Act hasn't diminished American liberties; it has helped to defend American liberties.
As I've written herebefore, the craphounds on the Left want you to think that Bush is destroying the Constitution. What fucking nonsense. He hasn't done enough to crack down on infiltrators and subversives.
The next time we're attacked on our own soil, listen very carefully to the people who claim that Bush allowed our fellow citizens to be murdered. These are the same wretched idiots who now claim that he has practically suspended writs of habeas corpus already.
Like I always say, those who think America is a Nazi police state deserve to experience the difference for themselves.
don't ask
celebratory
on fire
irritated
incredulous
loud
a-ok